Session Programme Meeting Programme Personal Programme Search
 
Quick Search
Days
Sunday
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Programme Groups
Great Debates
Union Symposia
Educational Symposia
Atmospheric Sciences
Biogeosciences
Climate: Past, Present, Future
Cryospheric Sciences
Energy, Resources and the Environment
Geochemistry, Mineralogy, Petrology & Volcanology
Geodesy
Geodynamics
Geomorphology
Geophysical Instrumentation
Hydrological Sciences
Magnetism, Palaeomagnetism, Rock Physics & Geomaterials
Natural Hazards
Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics
Ocean Sciences
Planetary and Solar System Sciences
Seismology
Soil System Sciences
Solar-Terrestrial Sciences
Stratigraphy, Sedimentology and Palaeontology
Tectonics and Structural Geology
Medal Lectures
Key Note Lectures
Key Note Sessions
Division Business Meetings
Editorial Board Meetings
Townhall Meetings
Splinter Meetings
Union Meetings
  Information - SPM1 Risk at different scales: A policy and regulatory dilemma

Event Information
NATIONAL SCALE RISK ASSESSMENT vs. LOCAL SCALE RISK ASSESSMENT

1.National risk assessment
A national-scale risk assessment for natural hazards is an outgrowth of a Government's desire to set a concrete socio-economic policy to protect its citizens from catastrophic natural hazards. For example, the question whether the socio-economic impact of Hurricane KATRINA could have been less if The US would have taken different mitigation actions if a national risk framework were in place. Is there a methodology for national scale risk assessment? Such an assessment would not be useful land use planning, or would it?

2.Local risk assessment
Most of us have experienced on a local risk assessment for natural hazard events. Is it possible to apply traditional risk assessment methods for evaluating local risk assessment? In other words, is a national risk assessment simply an aggregate of individual local risk assessment? Can the methodology for a local scale risk assessment be extended to national scale risk assessment? Is such aggregation possible because of the requirement of the amount of time and resources to complete a systematic assessment at large scale. Not only that, such extension is not desirable because national risk assessment is mainly for government wide policy, not land-use planning

3.Level of uncertainty for a national scale risk assessment
How is uncertainty considered at both scales?

These and other issues will be discussed at the splinter panel discussion. Please join us for a stimulating session.

Preliminary List of Solicited Speakers

Co-Sponsorship

General Statement
The information contained hereafter has been compiled and uploaded by the Session Organizers via the "Organizer Session Form". The Session Organizers have therefore the sole responsibility that this information is true and accurate at the date of publication, and the conference organizer cannot accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made, and he makes no warranty, expressed or implied, with regard to the material published.

 
 
 
 


©2002-2008 Copernicus Systems + Technology GmbH